Compare

A Yamdu alternative focused on the company, not the individual production

If you are evaluating Yamdu, you are already past the "do we need a real system" question — which makes this an easier comparison than most. Both tools take production work seriously. The distinction worth understanding before you commit is altitude: whether you need to organise the productions you have, or steer the company that wins them.

  • A single pipeline across every project the company has in play
  • Roster capacity, relationship CRM and financial reporting in the same platform
  • Built around commercial and creative production companies as businesses
Book a demoBack to overview

Ask what you want to be true in six months

If the answer is "our productions run more smoothly", the decision is about production workflow. If the answer is "we know what is in the pipeline, we stop double-booking directors, we can see which relationships are going cold, and we know by the second week of the quarter whether we are covering the company", then you are shopping for company operations — and that should shape the evaluation.

  • Production workflow and company steering are different purchases
  • Both are legitimate; only one fixes a leadership blind spot
  • The evaluation gets much easier once you name which one you need

Where 360 puts its weight

Four things, deliberately: the pipeline board with the status rules your team already follows; the roster timeline with pencils and holds treated as first-class states; the relationship graph that weights connections by real working history; and a management report measured against your breakeven target. They are one system because in a production company they are one problem.

  • Pipeline with status-driven required fields and per-stage teams
  • Capacity with pencils, holds and a role-matched freelancer pool
  • Network map plus revenue, win rate and profit by client and director

Choose Yamdu if…

  • Your priority is organising the internals of each production
  • The people who need the tool are production teams rather than company leadership
  • Company-wide pipeline, relationship mapping and financial roll-up are not what you are solving for

Choose 360 if…

  • You want producers and leadership working from the same system
  • Capacity across the whole roster is a weekly question you cannot currently answer
  • You want relationship strength visible, not just a contact list
  • You want revenue, pipeline and breakeven without rebuilding them in a spreadsheet

Common questions

Is this a like-for-like replacement?
Not exactly, and it would be misleading to say so. Both handle production work, but 360 is weighted towards running the company — pipeline, capacity, relationships and the numbers. Judge it against that, not feature for feature.
We are a commercial production company. Does that change the answer?
It is the case 360 is shaped around: pitching for jobs, booking directors, sharing reels, and living or dying by agency and client relationships.
Can we migrate our existing projects and contacts?
Yes. Bringing across the history you want to keep is part of onboarding rather than something you do alone afterwards.

Product

Pipeline board

Every project from first request through pitch, production, post and archive on one board — with the status rules and required fields your team already follows.

Capacity planning

See who is booked when across the whole roster. Pencils, holds and confirmed bookings on a timeline, with a freelancer pool for the overflow.

Pitch reels

Build director showcase reels, share them as branded microsites, and see exactly which films the client actually watched.

Book a demo

Compare it against your own pipeline

Bring the questions you are trying to answer and we will show you honestly whether 360 answers them.

We’ll only use your details to arrange your demo. No spam, ever.